Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Party Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Mobilizing Demobilized Voters in Post-Communist Societies

Richard Rose

A stable party system requires people to trust institutions, including parties, but in post-communist countries people have lived nearly all their lives in a political system that created distrust in reaction to aggressive attempts to mobilize support for the party-state. Comparative survey data from 10 post-communist countries show that the majority of electors are demobilized - that is, they distrust parties, do not identify with a party, the modal group is a don't know when asked to express a party preference, and committed partisans are only a quarter of the electorate. The result is that electoral support for parties is extremely volatile in comparison with election results in earlier waves of democratization. This does not immediately threaten the regime, however, for even though most people do not believe that they can influence government, even more importantly they feel greater freedom from the state, which cannot influence them as in the days of the communist party-state.

Key Words: democratization • electoral volatility • mobilization • parties

Party Politics, Vol. 1, No. 4, 549-563 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068895001004007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
J. A. Karp and S. A. Banducci
Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies
Party Politics, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 217 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
J. K. Birnir
Public Venture Capital and Party Institutionalization
Comparative Political Studies, October 1, 2005; 38(8): 915 - 938.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
P. G. Lewis
The `Third Wave' of Democracy in Eastern Europe: Comparative Perspectives on Party Roles and Political Development
Party Politics, September 1, 2001; 7(5): 543 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
G. SHABAD and K. M. SLOMCZYNSKI
Political Identities in the Initial Phase of Systemic Transformation in Poland: A Test of the Tabula Rasa Hypothesis
Comparative Political Studies, September 1, 1999; 32(6): 690 - 723.
[Abstract] [PDF]