This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Evans, G. Articles by Whitefield, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Economic Ideology and Political Success

Communist-Successor Parties in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary Compared

Stephen Whitefield

The communist-successor parties in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia have experienced divergent electoral fortunes since 1990. The Hungarian Socialist Party is in government, the Slovak Party of the Democratic Left has a stable vote of around 15 percent, while the Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia is in decline. This report seeks to explain this difference in performance using data derived from surveys of the population of each country in the spring of 1994. Consideration is given to the merits of two explanatory factors: the ideological extremeness of the parties, particularly in relation to the question of economic transformation; or, alternatively, national differences in the experience of economic transition. It is shown that in respect of economic issues, the positions of successor-party supporters are similar across the three countries, but that perceptions of the ideological position of those supporters vary considerably, from being extremist in the case of the Czech party, to centrist in the case of the Hungarian party. These differing perceptions themselves reflect national variations in economic preferences between the three countries, which are in turn shown to result from differing economic experiences. Support is thus offered for an account which stresses variations in experience of the economic transition rather than differences in the strategies adopted by the successor parties.

Key Words: central Europe • marketization • post-communist parties • public opinion

Party Politics, Vol. 1, No. 4, 565-578 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068895001004008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Ishiyama and J. J. Quinn African Phoenix? Explaining the Electoral Performance of the Formerly Dominant Parties in Africa Party Politics, May 1, 2006; 12(3): 317 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. N. Druckman and A. Roberts Context and Coalition-Bargaining: Comparing Portfolio Allocation in Eastern and Western Europe Party Politics, September 1, 2005; 11(5): 535 - 555. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Ishiyama Women's Parties in Post-Communist Politics East European Politics and Societies, May 1, 2003; 17(2): 266 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Ishiyama The Communist Successor Parties and Party Organizational Development in Post-Communist Politics Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 1999; 52(1): 87 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Ishiyama `Red versus Expert': Candidate Recruitment and Communist Party Adaptation in Post-Soviet Politics Party Politics, July 1, 1998; 4(3): 297 - 318. [Abstract]

				A. Agh Defeat and Success as Promoters of Party Change: The Hungarian Socialist Party after Two Abrupt Changes Party Politics, July 1, 1997; 3(3): 427 - 444. [Abstract]

				J. T. ISHIYAMA The Sickle or the Rose?: Previous Regime Types and the Evolution of the Ex-Communist Parties in Post-Communist Politics Comparative Political Studies, June 1, 1997; 30(3): 299 - 330. [Abstract]