Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Party Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rakner, L.
Right arrow Articles by SvÂsand, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From Dominant to Competitive Party System

The Zambian Experience 1991–2001

Lise Rakner

P.O. Box 6033, 5892 Bergen, Norway lise.rakner{at}cmi.no

Lars SvÂsand

Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Christiesgt. 15, 5007 Bergen, Norway lars.svasand{at}isp.uib.no

In this article we analyse the changes in the party system in Zambia in the period 1991 to 2001. Based on changes observed in terms of the number of parties, their relative size, ‘ideological distance’ and interaction patterns, we characterize the changes as movement from a dominant to a competitive party system after the 2001 elections. In the second part of the article we explain the changes and contend that the structure of political institutions in Zambia encouraged the formation of multiple parties. It is assumed that the development of a more competitive party system would ease the process of democratic consolidation by providing the electorate with electoral alternatives. However, as the emerging party system is fragmented, and several of the newly formed parties may be transient in character, it is doubtful whether these alternatives would contribute to improving democracy in Zambia.

Key Words: democratic consolidation • Zambia

Party Politics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 49-68 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068804041316


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Asian and African StudiesHome page
J. Ishiyama
Explaining `Minor' Party Nominations in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Cases of Ethiopia, Zambia and Malawi
Journal of Asian and African Studies, June 1, 2009; 44(3): 319 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
L. Rakner, L. Svasand, and N. S. Khembo
Fissions and Fusions, Foes and Friends: Party System Restructuring in Malawi in the 2004 General Elections
Comparative Political Studies, September 1, 2007; 40(9): 1112 - 1137.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
S. Booysen
The Will of the Parties Versus the Will of the People?: Defections, Elections and Alliances in South Africa
Party Politics, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 727 - 746.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
J. Ishiyama and J. J. Quinn
African Phoenix? Explaining the Electoral Performance of the Formerly Dominant Parties in Africa
Party Politics, May 1, 2006; 12(3): 317 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]