Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Party Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaisty, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Party Cohesion and Policy-Making in Russia

Paul Chaisty

Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Pembroke College, University of Oxford, paul.chaisty{at}pmb.ox.ac.uk

Most commentators agree that a consolidated party system has not emerged in Russia since the collapse of communism. At the same time, Russian parties within parliament have become more cohesive. Recent analysis of Russian legislative politics has concentrated on the electoral foundations of party cohesion, but the results are mixed. Alternative explanations of cohesion that focus on the policy-shaping incentives commanded by parties have received less attention. This article attempts to fill the gap by assessing the evidence for party effects on policy at different stages of the legislative process. Focusing on legislative results in the sphere of economic policy, party effects in two venues of legislative decision-making are examined: the Duma Council and legislative committees. The article contends that the provision of policy benefits provides a weak explanation for party cohesion in Russia. Other explanations, such as presidential strategy and intra-party arrangements, are proposed as alternative avenues of research.

Key Words: committees • economic policy • executive control • party discipline • Russia

Party Politics, Vol. 11, No. 3, 299-318 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068805051783


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
J. Kunicova and T. F. Remington
Mandates, Parties and Dissent: Effect of Electoral Rules on Parliamentary Party Cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994--2003
Party Politics, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 555 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]