Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Party Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mozaffar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Scarritt, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Puzzle of African Party Systems

Shaheen Mozaffar

Bridgewater State College, smozaffar{at}bridgew.edu

James R. Scarritt

University of Colorado at Boulder, Scarritt{at}colorado.edu

Two puzzling features characterize African party systems: low fragmentation and high volatility. We present systematic data describing these features and provide a theoretically grounded explanation of them. The explanation emphasizes the role of strategic choice structured by the institutional legacies of authoritarian regimes in the formation and development of political parties. Political restrictions under authoritarian regimes produced severe information deficit concerning electoral mobilization, strategic coordination and the collective action problems that typically attend party formation and coalition-building. Under these constraints, political actors in Africa’s emerging democracies established political parties to preserve their fragmented power bases and relied on presidential elections and ethno-political cleavages as alternative sources of strategic coordination over votes and seats and electoral coalition-building. The result is the entry of large numbers of short-lived political parties, producing high volatility, and the electoral and legislative dominance of a small number of large parties producing low party system fragmentation.

Key Words: Africa • institutional legacies • party system fragmentation • party system volatility • strategic choice

Party Politics, Vol. 11, No. 4, 399-421 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068805053210


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Asian and African StudiesHome page
J. Ishiyama
Explaining `Minor' Party Nominations in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Cases of Ethiopia, Zambia and Malawi
Journal of Asian and African Studies, June 1, 2009; 44(3): 319 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
M. Bogaards
Dominant Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Africa: A Comment on Mozaffar and Scarritt
Party Politics, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 113 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]