This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fellowes, M. Articles by Lowery, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

What’s on the Table? The Content of State Policy Agendas

The Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program, 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC 20036, USA. mfellowes{at}brookings.edu

Virginia Gray

Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. vagray{at}email.unc.edu

David Lowery

Department of Public Administration, University of Leiden, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. dlowery{at}fsw.leidenuniv.nl

While national policy agendas have evolved away from materialist issues to focus more on post-materialist concerns, much less is known about state legislative agendas. In this article, we utilize new data to describe the content of state legislative agendas from 1995 to 1999. We then examine why some states allocate more agenda space to postmaterialist policies than others. We find that states with larger and wealthier economies and greater representation by Democrats in the legislature allocate relatively more agenda space to post-materialist policies. We also find that the relative size of the population of interest organizations registered to lobby on post-materialist policies does not have a significant effect on the relative content of policy agendas. Representation of post-materialist policies in state agendas, while generally less dominant than in national agendas, originates, then, predominantly from the state’s economy and the political choices of its citizens.

Key Words: interest groups • policy agendas • post-materialism • state legislatures • state politics

Party Politics, Vol. 12, No. 1, 35-55 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068806059246


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Gray, D. Lowery, and E. K. Godwin Public Preferences and Organized Interests in Health Policy: State Pharmacy Assistance Programs as Innovations Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2007; 32(1): 89 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF]