This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bogaards, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Dominant Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Africa

A Comment on Mozaffar and Scarritt

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, D-28759 Bremen, Germany, p.j.m.bogaards{at}yacobs-university.de

In a recent publication in this journal, Mozaffar and Scarritt claim to have found a puzzling combination of low fragmentation and high volatility in African party systems. However, if we look at national party systems rather than Africa-wide averages, include regime type as a variable and specify dominance, we find three different constellations: dominant party systems with relatively low volatility, non-dominant and pulverized party systems with high volatility and dominant authoritarian party systems with high volatility. The real surprise is that dominant parties in authoritarian regimes have higher electoral instability than dominant parties in democracies. The analyis is based on data from 78 elections in 20 African countries with at least three consecutive multiparty elections.

Key Words: Africa • democracy • dominant parties • electoral volatility • fragmentation

Party Politics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 113-130 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068807083825


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?