Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Party Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scarrow, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Party Competition and Institutional Change

The Expansion of Direct Democracy in Germany

Susan E. Scarrow

A wave of plebiscitary reforms has swept the German states in the past decade. This study uses explanations for cartel party failure as a starting point for investigating why the biggest German parties defected from their long-held consensus against direct democracy. The article shows that, in an increasingly competitive electoral environment, parties were willing to sacrifice long-term benefits in hopes of making short-term electoral gains. More generally, it suggests that the course of institutional reform cannot be understood merely by looking at distributions of party interests and voter preferences. Instead, it is also necessary to examine why political actors come to see their interests in a different light.

Key Words: direct democracy • Germany • party competition • political parties

Party Politics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 451-472 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068897003004001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Political Research QuarterlyHome page
S. Bowler, T. Donovan, and J. A. Karp
When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2002; 55(4): 731 - 754.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Comparative Political StudiesHome page
S. E. SCARROW
Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation
Comparative Political Studies, August 1, 2001; 34(6): 651 - 665.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
S. E. Scarrow
Parties and the Expansion of Direct Democracy: Who Benefits?
Party Politics, July 1, 1999; 5(3): 341 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]