This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McSweeney, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Changing the Rules Changed the Game

Selecting Conservative Leaders

Some authors have argued that the change in the method of Conservative party leadership selection introduced in 1965 was modest in impact. This paper argues that the change in procedures transformed both the process and its outcomes. The effects of the procedural change are demonstrated by examining all leadership selections since 1945, comparing those conducted by informal consultation with those decided by ballots of MPs. The transformation is evident in the timing and form of selection contests, the candidates considered for selection, and the leaders who are chosen. Fragmentary evidence from past selections suggests that the inclusion of party members in selection will again reshape both the process and outcomes.

Key Words: intra-party divisions • leadership selection • party leadership • UK Conservative Party

Party Politics, Vol. 5, No. 4, 471-483 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068899005004003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?