Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Party Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy

Richard S. Katz

Candidate selection is vital to political parties but it also poses a dilemma, which is particularly acute in the cartel party, stemming from the position of MPs as both the base of the party in public office and the delegates of the party on the ground. One response is for leaders to democratize candidate selection in form, while centralizing control in practice. An inclusive but unorganized selectorate may give the appearance of democracy without the substance.

Key Words: Cartel Party • democracy • nomination

Party Politics, Vol. 7, No. 3, 277-296 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068801007003002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Comparative Political StudiesHome page
Y. Shomer
Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking Behavior
Comparative Political Studies, July 1, 2009; 42(7): 945 - 970.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
G. Rahat, R. Y. Hazan, and R. S. Katz
Democracy and Political Parties: On the Uneasy Relationships between Participation, Competition and Representation
Party Politics, November 1, 2008; 14(6): 663 - 683.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
W. Cross
Democratic Norms and Party Candidate Selection: Taking Contextual Factors into Account
Party Politics, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 596 - 619.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
B. N. Field and P. M. Siavelis
Candidate Selection Procedures in Transitional Polities: A Research Note
Party Politics, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 620 - 639.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
S. Barnea and G. Rahat
Reforming Candidate Selection Methods: A Three-Level Approach
Party Politics, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 375 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
R. K. Carty
Parties as Franchise Systems: The Stratarchical Organizational Imperative
Party Politics, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 5 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
K. Lundell
Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective
Party Politics, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 25 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Party PoliticsHome page
C. Sharman
Uncontested Seats and the Evolution of Party Competition: The Australian Case
Party Politics, November 1, 2003; 9(6): 679 - 702.
[Abstract] [PDF]