This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, D. A. Articles by Tolbert, C. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Initiative to Party

Partisanship and Ballot Initiatives in California

Caroline J. Tolbert

Previous research on the initiative process tends to underestimate the involvement of political parties in ballot measure contests as well as the impact of partisanship on initiative voting. Focusing on recent ballot contests in California, we find that the two major party organizations in California are actively using ballot initiatives to bolster voter turnout for their candidates, divide the opposition with `wedge' issues and promote their own party's platform and ideology. This party involvement in initiative contests seems to be paying off, as partisanship is the strongest predictor of votes on ballot measures in California at both the aggregate and individual levels. More generally, our research - which runs counter to the expectations of Populist and Progressive reformers - shines new light on how political parties are shaping not only the process, but also the politics of direct democracy.

Party Politics, Vol. 7, No. 6, 739-757 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068801007006004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Ensley and E. P. Bucy Do Candidate Positions Matter?: The Effect of the Gay Marriage Question on Gubernatorial Elections American Politics Research, January 1, 2010; 38(1): 142 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. Dyck and M. Baldassare Process Preferences and Voting in Direct Democratic Elections Public Opin Q, September 1, 2009; 73(3): 551 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Dyck Initiated Distrust: Direct Democracy and Trust in Government American Politics Research, July 1, 2009; 37(4): 539 - 568. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Tolbert, D. A. Smith, and J. C. Green Strategic Voting and Legislative Redistricting Reform: District and Statewide Representational Winners and Losers Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2009; 62(1): 92 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. A. Bali The Passage of Education Citizen Initiatives: Evidence From California Educational Policy, May 1, 2008; 22(3): 422 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Bowler and R. Hanneman Just How Pluralist Is Direct Democracy? The Structure of Interest Group Participation in Ballot Proposition Elections Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2006; 59(4): 557 - 568. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Bowler and T. Donovan Direct Democracy and Political Parties in America Party Politics, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 649 - 669. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Tolbert and D. A. Smith The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout American Politics Research, March 1, 2005; 33(2): 283 - 309. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. P. Branton Examining Individual-Level Voting Behavior on State Ballot Propositions Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2003; 56(3): 367 - 377. [Abstract] [PDF]