Party Politics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tolbert, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Party Politics, Vol. 7, No. 6, 739-757 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068801007006004
© 2001 SAGE Publications

The Initiative to Party

Partisanship and Ballot Initiatives in California

Daniel A. Smith

Caroline J. Tolbert

Previous research on the initiative process tends to underestimate the involvement of political parties in ballot measure contests as well as the impact of partisanship on initiative voting. Focusing on recent ballot contests in California, we find that the two major party organizations in California are actively using ballot initiatives to bolster voter turnout for their candidates, divide the opposition with `wedge' issues and promote their own party's platform and ideology. This party involvement in initiative contests seems to be paying off, as partisanship is the strongest predictor of votes on ballot measures in California at both the aggregate and individual levels. More generally, our research - which runs counter to the expectations of Populist and Progressive reformers - shines new light on how political parties are shaping not only the process, but also the politics of direct democracy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
V. A. Bali
The Passage of Education Citizen Initiatives: Evidence From California
Educational Policy, May 1, 2008; 22(3): 422 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
S. Bowler and R. Hanneman
Just How Pluralist Is Direct Democracy? The Structure of Interest Group Participation in Ballot Proposition Elections
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2006; 59(4): 557 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
S. Bowler and T. Donovan
Direct Democracy and Political Parties in America
Party Politics, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 649 - 669.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
C. J. Tolbert and D. A. Smith
The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout
American Politics Research, March 1, 2005; 33(2): 283 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
R. P. Branton
Examining Individual-Level Voting Behavior on State Ballot Propositions
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2003; 56(3): 367 - 377.
[Abstract] [PDF]