|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Preaching to the Converted?
Pluralism, Participation and Party Websites
Pippa Norris
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, www.pippanorris.com
In this study, it is theorized that party websites play a distinctive role in two regards: (i) they function as a pluralistic civic forum by facilitating the voice of oppositional challengers and increasing the visibility of minor and fringe parties, so that attentive citizens can learn more about the range of electoral choices; (ii) in addition, party websites function as a channel for political participation by facilitating interactive linkages between citizens and parties. The debate about the function of the Internet for pluralism and participation is laid out in Part I. The supply-and-demand research design, including content analysis of 134 websites (supply) and surveys of the public using party websites (demand), in the 15 European Union member states, drawn from the Spring 2000 Euro-barometer, is outlined in Part II. The evidence for patterns of party competition in European party websites is examined in Part III and in Part IV the use of party websites among West Europeans is analyzed. Compared with traditional mediated channels, substantial evidence is presented that party websites play a distinctive role in the process of political communications.
Key Words: elections Internet parties political communications
Party Politics, Vol. 9, No. 1,
21-45 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/135406880391003

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Strandberg
Online campaigning: an opening for the outsiders? An analysis of Finnish parliamentary candidates' websites in the 2003 election campaign
New Media Society,
August 1, 2009;
11(5):
835 - 854.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Strandberg
Online Electoral Competition in Different Settings: A Comparative Meta-Analysis of the Research on Party Websites and Online Electoral Competition
Party Politics,
March 1, 2008;
14(2):
223 - 244.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Small
Equal Access, Unequal Success Major and Minor Canadian Parties On the Net
Party Politics,
January 1, 2008;
14(1):
51 - 70.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hooghe and W. Teepe
Party profiles on the web: an analysis of the logfiles of non-partisan interactive political internet sites in the 2003 and 2004 election campaigns in Belgium
New Media Society,
December 1, 2007;
9(6):
965 - 985.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sulkin, C. M. Moriarty, and V. Hefner
Congressional Candidates' Issue Agendas On- and Off-line
International Journal of Press/Politics,
April 1, 2007;
12(2):
63 - 79.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Pedersen and J. Saglie
New Technology in Ageing Parties: Internet Use in Danish and Norwegian Parties
Party Politics,
May 1, 2005;
11(3):
359 - 377.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Farmer and R. Fender
E-Parties: Democratic and Republican State Parties in 2000
Party Politics,
January 1, 2005;
11(1):
47 - 58.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|