This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Eom, K. Articles by Gross, D. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Democratization Effects of Campaign Contribution Limits in Gubernatorial Elections

Kyungpook National University in Korea, kheom{at}knu.ac.kr

Donald A. Gross

University of Kentucky in the USA, POL146{at}uky.edu

Campaign contribution limits have become a common feature of campaign finance reform efforts in most states. The use of contribution limits has been seen as an important mechanism by which to lessen the influence of so-called `special interests' and to encourage citizen participation. Contribution limits could `democratize' the system of contributions by forcing candidates to rely on a larger number of smaller contributions, thereby reducing the value of any single contribution. In this article, we focus on the alleged `democratization' effects of campaign contribution limits. We examine 58 gubernatorial elections in 42 states during the period 1990 to 2000. Analyses of the number of contributors, the total dollar amount of contributions and the average amount given by contributors suggest that contribution limits do have a democratization effect. The nature of the effect, however, depends upon whether one examines all contributors, just particularistic contributors or just individualistic contributors.

Key Words: American gubernatorial elections • campaign contribution limits • democracy of political contributions • special interests group

References

• Ansolabehere, Stephen, John de Figueiredo and James M. Snyder (2003) `Why Is There So Little Money in U.S. Politics?' Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 105—30.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Aranson, Peter H. and Melvin J. Hinich (1979) `Some Aspects of the Political Economy of Election Campaign Contribution Laws', Public Choice 34: 435—61.[Web of Science]
• Ben-Zion, Uri and Zeev Eytan (1974) `On Money, Votes, and Policy in a Democratic Society ', Public Choice 17: 1—10.[CrossRef]
• Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and Jay K. Dow (1992) `Campaign Contributions in an Unregulated Setting: An Analysis of the 1984 and 1986 California Assembly Elections', Western Political Quarterly 45: 609—28.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Corrado, Anthony, Thomas E. Mann, Daniel R. Ortiz, Trevor Potter and Frank J. Sorauf (eds) (1997) Campaign Finance Reform: A Sourcebook. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
• Cox, Gary W. and Eric Magar (1999) `How Much is Majority Status in the U.S. Congress Worth?' American Political Science Review 93: 299—309.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Eom, Kihong and Donald A. Gross (forthcoming) `Contribution Limits and Disparity in Contributions between Gubernatorial Candidates', Political Research Quarterly.
• Feigenbaum, Edward D. and James A. Palmer (1990—2000) Campaign Finance Law: A Summary of State Campaign Finance Laws With Quick Reference Charts. Washington, D.C.: Federal Election Commission.
• Fuchs, Ester R., E. Scott Adler and Lincoln A. Mitchell (2000) `Win, Place, Show: Public Opinion Polls and Campaign Contributions in a New York City Election', Urban Affairs Review 35: 479—501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Goidel, Robert K., Donald A. Gross and Todd G. Shields (1999) Money Matters: Consequences of Campaign Finance Reform. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• Gross, Donald A. and Robert K. Goidel (2003) The States of Campaign Finance. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
• Gross, Donald A., Robert K. Goidel and Todd G. Shields (2002) `State Campaign Finance Regulations and Electoral Competition', American Politics Research 30: 143—65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hendrie, Paul, Jonathan D. Salant and Larry Makinson (2000) Follow the Money Handbook: Handbook, 2nd edn. Washington, D.C.: Center for Responsive Politics.
• Hinich, Melvin J. (1977) `A Model for Campaign Contributions', in R. Auster and B. Sears (eds) American Re-evolution: Papers and Proceedings, pp. 47—52. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
• Hogan, Robert E. (2000) `The Costs of Representation in State Legislatures: Explaining Variations in Campaign Spending', Social Science Quarterly 81: 941—56.[Web of Science]
• Jones, Ruth S. and Anne H. Hopkins (1985) `State Campaign Fund Raising: Targets and Response', Journal of Politics 47: 427—49.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Malbin, Michael J. and Thomas L. Gais (1998) The Day After Reform, 1st edn. New York: Rockefeller Institute Press.
• Medvic, Stephen K. (2001) `The Impact of Party Financial Support on the Electoral Success of US House Candidates', Party Politics 7: 191—212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Morton, Rebecca and Charles Cameron (1992) `Elections and the Theory of Campaign Contributions: A Survey and Critical Analysis', Economics and Politics 4: 79—108.[CrossRef]
• Mutz, Diana C. (1995) `Effects of Horse-Race Coverage on Campaign Coffers: Strategic Contributing in Presidential Primaries', Journal of Politics 57: 1015—42.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Pattie, Charles J., Ronald J. Johnston and Edward A. Fieldhouse (1995) `Winning the Local Vote: the Effectiveness of Constituency Campaign Spending in Great Britain, 1983—1992 ', American Political Science Review 89: 969—83.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Poole, Keith T. and Thomas Romer (1985) `Patterns of Political Action Committee Contributions to the 1980 Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives', Public Choice 47: 63—112.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Rosenstone, Steven J. and John Mark Hansen (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America, New Topics in Politics. New York: Macmillan.
• Sabato, Larry J. (1984) PAC Power: Inside the World of Political Action Committees. New York: W. W. Norton.
• Scammon, Richard M., Alice V. McGillivray and Rhodes Cook (2000) America Votes 24: A Handbook of Contemporary American Election Statistics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
• Shields, Todd G. and Robert K. Goidel (2000) `Who Contributes? Checkbook Participation, Class Biases, and the Impact of Legal Reforms, 1952—1994 ', American Politics Quarterly 28: 216—33.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Shin, Myungsoon, Youngjae Jin, Donald A. Gross and Kihong Eom (2005) `Money Matters in Party-Centered Politics: Campaign Spending in the Korean Congressional Elections', Electoral Studies 24: 85—101.[Web of Science]
• Smith, Bradley A. (1996) `Faulty Assumptions and Undemocratic Consequences of Campaign Finance Reform', Yale Law Journal 105: 1049—91.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Snyder, James M. (1990) `Campaign Contributions as Investments: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1980—1986', Journal of Political Economy 98: 1195—227.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Snyder, James M. (1993) `The Market for Campaign Contributions: Evidence for the U.S. Senate 1980—1986', Economics and Politics 5: 219—40.[CrossRef]
• Sorauf, Frank J. (1992) Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and Realities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Stratmann, Thomas (1995) `Campaign Contributions and Congressional Voting — Does the Timing of Contributions Matter', Review of Economics and Statistics 77: 127—36.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Stratmann, Thomas and Francisco J. Aparicio-Castillo (2001) `Competition Policy for Elections: Do Campaign Contribution Limits Matter?' Unpublished manuscript.
• Thomas, Scott E. (2003) The Presidential Election Public Funding Program — A Commissioner's Perspective. Task Force on Financing Presidential Nominations Report. Washington, D.C.: Campaign Finance Institute. Available at: http://www.fec.gov/members/thomas/thomasarticle08.pdf (accessed 11 April 2005).
• US Census Bureau (1990— 2001) Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: US Census Bureau.
• Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman and Henry E. Brady (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Welch, William P. (1974) `The Economics of Campaign Funds', Public Choice 20: 83—97.[CrossRef]
• Welch, William P. (1980) `The Allocation of Political Monies: Economic Interest Groups', Public Choice 35: 97—120.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Party Politics, Vol. 13, No. 6, 695-720 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1354068807081817


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Eom, K. Articles by Gross, D. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?